Vote Flipping Video in 2008 Election
Is McCain going to steal the election? The poor performance of uncalibrated electronic voting machines, which can check a different box than you touch if they are intentionally, or accidentally miscalibrated, may lead to voter confusion this year. For example, the following photo shows the actual difference between where you touch, and what candidate registers:
I took it from the following youtube video:
You can read WIDESPREAD TOUCH SCREEN VOTE FLIPPING!! at Daily Kos for an emotional rundown:
It’s been the ES&S iVotronic touch-screen machines that have failed, flipping votes from one candidate to another not chosen by the voter. In virtually every instance, it’s been an attempted Democratic vote, that has flipped to a Republican, or been flipped another party (third party candidate).
While this could be dismissed as small, technical error, coupled with ineptitude, it could also be the only part of a conspiracy to keep the Bush legacy in office. The so-called “tip of the iceberg” of the Bush/Republican dynasty. In a way, it’s good that widespread technology is being brought into the public awareness–for too long people have “trusted the system” without realizing how fragile it actually is. Your heat, electricity, transportation, and water are all controlled by computer systems. If those fail (like the election systems appear to be), your basic necessities will no longer be met.
| This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 28th, 2008 at 8:18 pm and is tagged with electronic voting machines, youtube video, daily kos, voter confusion, heat electricity, ivotronic, democratic vote, technical error, election systems, ineptitude, party candidate, poor performance, tip of the iceberg, rundown, public awareness, basic necessities, touch screen, mccain, dynasty, computer systems. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback. |
He was mistaken at 1:49. At the end of the full interview, he shows that if you select a candidate first, then a straight party, the candidate doesn't change.
Nader didn't “come up.” He was already selected before the Mountain Party was selected.
The calibration (stylus) was correct. He misspoke.
i think it,s a great blog.