<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rope Burning Interview Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elliottback.com/wp/rope-burning-interview-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/rope-burning-interview-question/</link>
	<description>Internet &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:01:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: beth</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/rope-burning-interview-question/#comment-2193196</link>
		<dc:creator>beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/11/22/rope-burning-interview-question/#comment-2193196</guid>
		<description>how would u do 52.5 minutes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how would u do 52.5 minutes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/rope-burning-interview-question/#comment-2190505</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/11/22/rope-burning-interview-question/#comment-2190505</guid>
		<description>This is a pretty unusual rope, Vimal, which might take 59.99 minutes to burn 1/1000th of its length, and 0.01 minutes to burn the rest.  Still so sure it will always burn at the same rate in either direction? ;)

Anyway, it&#039;s easy enough to design a rope that will burn slowly for the first half and faster for the second half *AND* do so in both directions.  Simply take two ropes that burn faster in one direction than the other.  Let&#039;s say they take 32 minutes to burn in one direction and 28 minutes in the other.  Now join the &quot;fast&quot; ends.  Voila: the rope will burn end to end in one hour but when lit from both ends will take 32 minutes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a pretty unusual rope, Vimal, which might take 59.99 minutes to burn 1/1000th of its length, and 0.01 minutes to burn the rest.  Still so sure it will always burn at the same rate in either direction? <img src='http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s easy enough to design a rope that will burn slowly for the first half and faster for the second half *AND* do so in both directions.  Simply take two ropes that burn faster in one direction than the other.  Let&#8217;s say they take 32 minutes to burn in one direction and 28 minutes in the other.  Now join the &#8220;fast&#8221; ends.  Voila: the rope will burn end to end in one hour but when lit from both ends will take 32 minutes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vimal</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/rope-burning-interview-question/#comment-2190463</link>
		<dc:creator>Vimal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/11/22/rope-burning-interview-question/#comment-2190463</guid>
		<description>Nick,

The analogy of the cyclists, though appearing to be similar, isn&#039;t similar.

Suppose, like you say, the course of the cyclists is like a hill, halfway uphill and half way downhill. In this case, there exists a symmetry. No matter which end you start from, the first half is always uphill (and so takes more time).

There&#039;s no such summetry for the rope. You can&#039;t design a rope that&#039;ll burn slowly for the first half and faster for the second half *AND* do so in both directions!

If you burn both ends of the rope, it will burn in half the time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,</p>
<p>The analogy of the cyclists, though appearing to be similar, isn&#8217;t similar.</p>
<p>Suppose, like you say, the course of the cyclists is like a hill, halfway uphill and half way downhill. In this case, there exists a symmetry. No matter which end you start from, the first half is always uphill (and so takes more time).</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no such summetry for the rope. You can&#8217;t design a rope that&#8217;ll burn slowly for the first half and faster for the second half *AND* do so in both directions!</p>
<p>If you burn both ends of the rope, it will burn in half the time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/rope-burning-interview-question/#comment-2190301</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/11/22/rope-burning-interview-question/#comment-2190301</guid>
		<description>Gene,

We&#039;re told that the rope takes an hour to burn from one end to the other, and I think we can reasonably assume that&#039;s the case no matter which end is lit.  But it doesn&#039;t immediately follow that if we light *both* ends it will take the rope 1/2 hour to burn out.

To see why, you only have to imagine two cyclists who can both cycle from A to B (or B to A) in one hour.  Yet when they both set off at the same time, one from A and one from B, it takes them not 30 but 45 minutes to meet.  Why?  Because they&#039;ve both been cycling uphill!

That&#039;s the flaw in the riddle.  We have to assume something like: any given section of each rope takes the same time to burn in either direction.  We&#039;re not told that, and I&#039;m not convinced it&#039;s a reasonable or (given the uneven nature of the rope) a physically realistic assumption to make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gene,</p>
<p>We&#8217;re told that the rope takes an hour to burn from one end to the other, and I think we can reasonably assume that&#8217;s the case no matter which end is lit.  But it doesn&#8217;t immediately follow that if we light *both* ends it will take the rope 1/2 hour to burn out.</p>
<p>To see why, you only have to imagine two cyclists who can both cycle from A to B (or B to A) in one hour.  Yet when they both set off at the same time, one from A and one from B, it takes them not 30 but 45 minutes to meet.  Why?  Because they&#8217;ve both been cycling uphill!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the flaw in the riddle.  We have to assume something like: any given section of each rope takes the same time to burn in either direction.  We&#8217;re not told that, and I&#8217;m not convinced it&#8217;s a reasonable or (given the uneven nature of the rope) a physically realistic assumption to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/rope-burning-interview-question/#comment-2190300</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/11/22/rope-burning-interview-question/#comment-2190300</guid>
		<description>Nick,

The way to think about it is that the rope burns for one hour no matter which side is lit.  The composition of the rope doesn&#039;t matter.  If you light it from one end it will burn to a certain point on the rope in 1/2 hour, leaving some length of rope that will burn in the remaining 1/2 hour. Therefore if you light both ends the fires will meet at that point in 1/2 hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,</p>
<p>The way to think about it is that the rope burns for one hour no matter which side is lit.  The composition of the rope doesn&#8217;t matter.  If you light it from one end it will burn to a certain point on the rope in 1/2 hour, leaving some length of rope that will burn in the remaining 1/2 hour. Therefore if you light both ends the fires will meet at that point in 1/2 hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.257 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 04:22:51 -->

